Monday 26th February 2007

Jesus likes existential veracity very much, the loyal judgement about himself.

 

As an intellectual he tended to consider his mystical Gifts as divine aggressions to his personality. “Barbarian invasions” on La7.

 

Being sacred is relative sacredness.

 

He could not prophesise on demand, but spontaneously and freely.

 

Satan is terrible.

 

How many careerists in the church. They would even adulate God for their career. Even at death’s door.

 

Satan is defeated in our souls only praising and celebrating God’s mercies and loves with all our strength.

 

A lot of clergymen are made in man’s image.

 

Overwhelm me, do not spare me.

 

The end is an instant, an Instant similar to the Instant of Creation.

 

Let us sit with Jesus on the Father’s right.

 

Illness puts us in our right perspectives.

 

In the Communion he was with Jesus on the Father’s right.

 

The only cloud, full of rain, on the parched desert, is the most splendid weather symbol of the Holy Spirit.

 

Jesus is the end of ecclesial roman system, centred on the pope’s absolutist solitude.

 

With the resurrection Jesus does not lose His genitals. Resurrection does not mean castration. We have to adore every single part of Jesus’s body, eyes, hair, hands, feet, lips, also his genitals. With the innocence of children.

 

The scars of the Resurrected together with His genitals: here are the dialectical roots of a genuine sexual education.

 

God’s lips are named Jesus.

 

Do we get homosexual because of our Passion for Jesus?

 

Mary tempers Christian psyche.

 

In Eucharist Jesus gives His body, so also His sex. His body is a complete gift.

 

The blunder of Mary’s permanent virginity has made her without sex.

 

Also Mary, like Jesus, has been subjugated to the system and its political needs.

 

We have to live sex in a reasonable way, intelligent, responsible, innocent.

 

If you do not become like these children, you will never enter the Reign: just like Jesus. In sexual matters you have to behave as adults and children together. You have to keep children’s freshness, creativity, curiosity, laughing, loyalty, faith.

 

You have to become children when in bed: Jesus says it implicitly.

 

Jesus’s philosophy about children is not only religious, but also integral,    goes as a bow to sex, divine “blessing” that churches cursed and still curse using new politically correct languages.

 

The one who is scandalized, scandalises himself.

 

Satan, god of ecumenical programmes in slow motion. The god of eternal prayer for Christians’ unity.

 

The Eucharistic ecumenical community celebrates the saving wonders of God, waiting for the  glorious coming of Jesus, contemplating His Word and liturgically enjoying His presence.

 

Some members of such a community, Catholics, treat the Eucharistic species as “body” and “blood” of Jesus, even if not appropriately consecrated.

 

Actually and ultimately: the Catholics take part in the Eucharistic ecumenic celebration as catholics.

 

In friendly contradiction with Hans Küng. The Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit are not only God, but divine relational People.

 

Jesus Christ is not only the Decisive, but above all the embodied. How can a man be decisive, how can a man determine all the other men, as a man? Christianity would be anthropolatry, in this case.

Always in friendly contradiction with Hans.

 

The Word has become man. He has not come into a man.

 

The fact that Jesus was resurrected belongs to a new testament theology, still ingenuous, rough and shapeless, that is going to become truth: Christ resurrects, He is not resurrected.

 

I ask Hans Küng: why is only Christ the Decisive, not Buddha or Krishna? Simply because he was resurrected by God? Why cannot God resurrect other people before the universal resurrection? Küng’s Christology causes more problems than the ones solved. However we have to be grateful to the great theologian for his courageous linguistic experimentation in theology.

This article is available in Italian too